Update On Our Global Dialogue

I am very pleased and honored to tell you that Thai Beverage, a major Thai company most supportive of a Buddhist approach to development – the sufficiency economy principles proposed by His Late Majesty King Rama IX – has agreed to sponsor the 2023 Global Dialogue.  With the company’s support, we will have with us at Mountain House several very thoughtful Thai opinion leaders.

Secondly, two of our colleagues from Beijing, professors most conversant with pre-imperial Chinese moral philosophy, have permission to join us.

Thirdly, Klaus Leisinger of the Global Values Alliance, former president of the Novartis Foundation and colleague of Hans Kung, will join us on July 26 to share his concerns and his optimism about what private thought leaders can accomplish in recommending global approaches to our common, shared conundrums.

Fourth, I am especially reassured by notes from a number of colleagues who plan to join the dialogue that our focus on the ethical foundations for our global community, as we move into the 21st century on a note of stress and conflict, is timely and of fundamental importance.

I hope you will find it possible to come to Caux, Switzerland on July 26 and 27.

I attach a copy of the proposed agenda here and the draft civilizational ethic here.

To learn more or to register, please click here.

Can We Find Grace in Our Lives? Please Join Us June 27 on Zoom

A distinctive act of the Protestant Reformation was to place responsibility directly and centrally on the individual.  Ethics and morality thereby became one’s very personal responsibility, part of one’s vocation as a person.  And yet, somewhat to the contrary, Protestant thinkers such as Martin Luther and John Calvin placed limits on the effectiveness of one’s being responsible for giving rise to a claim on God for eternal salvation.  For that, they said, we could only hope for God’s grace and through prayer invoke his beneficence.

Grace, therefore, became a standard for good.

The word grace also connotes that which affords joy, pleasure, delight, sweetness, charm and loveliness.  It is an aesthetic, a source of beauty.  We think of graceful manners, speech, music and dance.

It might be that the work of the Caux Round Table in promoting principles for business and government is a work of grace – grace coming from those who engage in the work and grace in those who live by those principles.

This reference to grace in business ethics, corporate social responsibility, ESG, social justice and political constitutionalism may be innovative, but also possibly instructive.

If we are to seek grace in ourselves and in our world, such work must spring from within us and be manifested outwardly.  It would be more than traditional ethics, either deontological or utilitarian or alignment with moral criteria without much inner authenticity.  In politics, it would be the basis for leadership.

Please join us at 9:00 am (CDT) on Tuesday, June 27 on Zoom to reflect with us on the meaning of grace and its possible contribution to better living.

To register, please email us at jed@cauxroundtable.net.

By the way, in May Pegasus, we include a piece on grace by our colleague, Michael Hartoonian, who will be with us on the call.

The event is free and will last about an hour.

Warren Buffett’s 2023 Letter: A Theory of Capitalism

For six decades, Warren Buffett, now 92, has sent investors in his Berkshire Hathaway fund an annual letter containing his thoughts and observations about the business and its ecosystem.

I have just read his 2023 letter.  It is shorter and more spare than many of his prior ones.  This year, he focuses on data – fiscal results of investments and company business models.  He does so by looking back at the history of his investment decisions and their varying results.  He admits that some decisions were excellent, others mediocre and some just bad.

On balance, however, and that is a metric he uses – balance out the good, the bad and the ugly; track the trendlines instead of obsessing on the volatility highs and lows; separate sheep from goats, apples from oranges.

For his philosophical approach, he just mentions the obligation to do well for the people who trust him with their money and the reality that “the disposition of money unmasks humans”; that he is a business-picker, not a stock-picker.

He credits the secret sauce of success in investing as cash flow.  He struck gold when he invested in Coca Cola in August 1994 and with American Express in 1995.  Those two companies have  paid higher and higher dividends annually, as the earth has rotated around the sun ever since. Other companies did not pay good dividends, so their capital value to Berkshire dropped and dropped.  Conclusion: the weeds wither away as the flowers bloom.

Pick flowers, not weeds.

He notes that of the S&P 500 companies, in 2021, only 128 earned $3 billion or more, while 23 lost money.  Berkshire was the largest owner of 8 of these profitable giants.

Here, Buffett’s focus on data leads him to a theory, a theory of capitalism.  He understands that narratives do not drive facts.  Rather, facts drive conclusions about reality.  He writes: “Capitalism has two sides: the system creates an ever-growing pile of losers, while concurrently delivering a gusher of improved goods and services.”  It’s a mixed bag – some win and some lose.  On balance, however, capitalism delivers for everyone in gross, if not at the margin for some.

Buffett’s mindset is congruent with reality.  That should be a lesson for us.  Ideals and good intentions, the precise social engineering of equality and fairness, only intrude on a natural process and may not be integral to its system dynamics.  Our thinking and our wishing must partner with reality if well-being is to be experienced.  “If wishes were horses, beggars would ride,” was the old truth.  In a way, Buffett believes that the truth shall make you better off.

In line with this theory of real economic growth, Buffett admits that his profits have come from the working of a system that he does not control.  Rather, he knows his returns are only part of a giant stream of commerce, finance and industry, culture and governance flowing through history, driven by the decisions, preferences, fears and ambitions of millions of individuals.

He calls this stream the “American Tailwind,” as if he were only the pilot of a small plane being pushed forward (or backwards, as the case might be from time to time) by the force of a human system called the sovereign nation of the United States of America.  Buffet is proud of owning companies that are broadly aligned with America’s economic future.  He writes: “We count on the American Tailwind and though it has been becalmed from time to time, its propelling force has always returned.”

You can read the letter here.

May you invest as wisely as Warren Buffet has done.

May Pegasus Now Available!

Here’s the May edition of Pegasus.

In this issue, we share with you two papers presented by myself and one of our fellows, John Dalla Costa, at a seminar convened by Kufa University in Najaf, Iraq, last March (John’s is in the form of a PowerPoint presentation).  

We also include a piece on grace from our associate editor, Michael Hartoonian.

I would be most interested in your thoughts and feedback.

2023 Global Dialogue: Foundational Principles for a New Global Ethic

The Caux Round Table for Moral Capitalism, in collaboration with Initiatives of Change, will convene a Global Dialogue on Foundational Principles for a New Global Ethic at Mountain House in Caux, Switzerland, on July 26 and 27 and you are invited to join us.

Since this is the first Global Dialogue since the Covid pandemic and since there is a new setting of uncertainty and disequilibrium in our global order, the Global Dialogue proposes to table for its participants the question of what ethics are needed at this time in history?

Can we restore the post-World War II liberal international order?  Are we in some interregnum, searching for new paradigms?  Is our time one where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must, as Thucydides quoted the ethic of the Athenians so long ago?

The Caux Round Table will propose a draft global ethic incorporating principles from different wisdom traditions.  The Caux Round Table has undertaken a study with Catholic, Sunni and Shi’a colleagues of certain covenants given by the Prophet Muhammad to respect and protect Christians, deepening its understanding of Islamic values.  The Caux Round Table has also engaged with Buddhist thinkers in Thailand on the Buddha’s recommendations on moderation, balance and equilibrium.  These action orientations have inspired an approach to economic justice denominated by the late King Rama IX as a “sufficiency” economy.

We are planning for the participation of our Catholic, Sunni, Shi’a and Thai colleagues in the Global Dialogue.  The goal of the dialogue is to reach a common understanding on a new humanism with responsible individualism in the context of social coexistence at the core of our aspirations for peace and prosperity.

A proposed agenda for the discussions can be found here.

The dialogue will begin with dinner on the evening of July 25 and conclude with a dinner on July 27.  Mountain House is easily reachable by train from the Geneva airport with a transfer at Montreux to a cog railway up the mountain to Caux.  Mountain House is 50 meters from the Caux station.

The registration fee to support administrative expenses of the Caux Round Table is US$549 (includes processing fees).  I expect that the daily accommodation charge at Mountain House, per person, for meals and a room will be CHF150 or about US$166.  Please note this is in addition to the US$549 and would be paid directly to Mountain House.

To register, please click here.

If you have any questions, please email us at jed@cauxroundtable.net.

More Short Videos on Relevant and Timely Topics

We recently posted more short videos on relevant and timely topics.  They include:

Capitalism and the Gilded Age

The Durham Report and Public Trust

Report on a Visit to Thailand

Preparing People to Think

Enablers of the Unethical

All our videos can be found on our YouTube page here.  We recently put them into 9 playlists, which you can find here.

If you aren’t following us on Twitter or haven’t liked us on Facebook, please do so.  We update both platforms frequently.

2022 Dayton Awards Event: Video

On May 2, the Caux Round Table presented Mary Kowalski, owner of Kowalski’s Markets, Kris Kowalski Christiansen, CEO of Kowalski’s Markets and Kyle Smith, CEO of Reell Precision Manufacturing, with our 2022 Dayton Award.

Kris Kowalski Christiansen, Mary Kowalski and Kyle Smith
Kris Kowalski Christiansen, Mary Kowalski and Kyle Smith

The Caux Round Table Principles for Business of 1994 reflect the special legacy of Minnesota business leadership in seeking success through service to community and stakeholders.  This remarkable legacy was epitomized by the Dayton Family – founders and owners of Dayton’s department store and Target Corporation, generous benefactors of the arts and community organizations.

The award seeks to recognize leadership, not position.  In fact, small and family-owned companies contribute more to the quality of our daily lives than do large corporations.  Small businesses constitute 99% of all American companies and employ 47% of working Americans.  We have also found that small and family-owned companies are more in touch with their stakeholders than are large corporations, which tend, on the whole, to favor shareholders.  The companies that made Minnesota prosperous with a high quality of life, honest and dedicated public officials and dynamic civil society nonprofits started as family-owned or small companies.

You can watch the event here.

Many thanks to our participant, Loren Swanson, for recording it.

Being a Decent Person

I recently wrote a short comment on the morality of using words.  I just received a comment from Jim Lukaszewski on how we can get to “decency” in our relationships with others.  I thought his ideal of decency is pretty close to a common, cross-cultural understanding of morality, very much like the ideal of “virtue” proposed by Mencius and the behaviors advocated by the Buddha in his noble eightfold way to take in our lives.

In using words, Lukaszewski recommends:

STOP Incivility Before or After It Starts

The true test of civility is a commitment to verbal and written communication that are predominantly positive and declarative and behaviors that are simple, sensitive, sensible, constructive, positive, helpful, humble, empathetic and always benefit the recipient more than the giver.  Any other pathways lead only to trouble, prolong problems and delay mitigation and resolution.  Empathy means positive deeds that speak louder and more constructively than words.

The true test of civility is a commitment to verbal, written communication, deeds and actions that benefit a recipient more than the sender.  Here are 39 possible paths that can get you to civility, decency, integrity and trust.  Always pick as many as you can, as frequently as you can.

1. Accountability
2. Apology
3. Calmness
4. Candor
5. Character
6. Charitability
7. Chivalry
8. Civility
9. Compassion
10. Constructiveness
11. Courtesy
12. Decency
13. Dignity
14. Empathy: positive deeds that always speak louder than words
15. Engagement
16. Forgiveness
17. Gratitude
18. Helpfulness
19. Honesty
20. Honor
21. Humility
22. Integrity
23. Listening: the greatest decency
24. Openness
25. Peacefulness
26. Pleasantness
27. Politeness
28. Positivity
29. Principle
30. Respect
31. Responsiveness
32. Sensibility
33. Sensitivity
34. Simplicity
35. Softness
36. Tact
37. Thoughtfulness
38. Transparency
39. Truthfulness

Remember, the reverse of any of these words, ideas or behaviors only lead to trouble, problems and delayed mitigation and resolution; plus, revictimizing those who have been injured.

Interest Rates and Valuation

Higher interest rates do more than cause prices to rise and investments to be postponed or cancelled.  They can reduce valuations of assets.  With higher interest rates, it takes longer for an asset to earn a market return, which reduces its net present value.

Also, loans made at a lower interest rate are worth less to potential buyers of such investment contracts when rates go up.  Thus, in the U.S., the Silicon Valley Bank bankrupted itself by putting too much of its capital into low interest rate U.S. government bonds.

Now in the U.S., nearly every publicly traded bank corporation has loans on its books as assets, which are worth less today than when they were made.  Rising interest rates cause the decline in market value of the loan repayment notes.

The mission of capitalism is to create wealth.  High interest rates, then, put obstacles in the way of that achievement.

So, when we seek to evaluate the social good – the public good – of capitalism, we should keep a close eye on those conditions which make for wealth creation and those which inhibit such economic growth.

Managing interest rates is a seeking of balance between too high and too low.  A middle way suggests itself as most conducive to enhancing society’s well-being.

Capitalism and Social Media: Creative Destruction

One of the most exciting and stimulating aspects of capitalism is also one of its most alienating – innovation and the creation of new ways to use land, labor, capital and machines.  Some win, but others lose.  The system is a churning whirlpool of dynamic interactions.

Social media was created for us by capitalism through innovation, invention of technologies and satisfaction of consumer needs and wants.  Are we better or worse off for capitalism having invented and sold social media?  Both, perhaps.  As some Vietnamese Buddhists say, “No gain without a loss.”

The Economist recently opined that TikTok has “changed social media for good,” in the sense of “forever.”  TikTok invented an information collection system which used algorithms to decide which short videos should be shown to its consumers.  Consumers love the dependency on AI for entertaining them.  But the business model generates less revenue for the social media platform.

In five years, in the American social media market, TikTok has attracted some 100 million plus users.

To compete, Facebook and Instagram have turned their main feeds into algorithmically sorted “discovery engines.”  Similar, look-alike products have been put in the social media marketplace by Pinterest, Snapchat, YouTube, Netflix and now, Spotify.  As a result, short-term video has taken over social media.

Of the 64 minutes that the average American spends viewing such services a day, 40 minutes are spent on short videos.  The new format is less profitable than the old news feed.

TikTok monetizes its customers (suppliers?) at $0.31 for every hour of use, much lower than Facebook and Instagram.

The ad load attached to a short video is less than other content.

Secondly, video ads are more expensive to produce, limiting the number of advertisers willing to pay for their placement on the short video platforms.

Thirdly, video games attract customers.  Last year, globally, some 3.2 billion people played video games.  Usage has grown with the spread of smartphones, a technological innovation of capitalism.  The game market will be worth U.S. $185 billion this year.

Fourth, Elon Musk talks as if he has a new business model for Twitter.  He wants to promote “citizen journalism” (and profit therefrom) to take market share from the legacy media in print and television.  He plans to give users who tweet and have their posts checked for reliability and accuracy the role of journalists – finding news and bringing it before the public.  This is power to the people on a scale never imagined by the founders of Students for a Democratic Society in 1962 with their Port Huron Statement.